Cases 1 - 10 of 1,520
BMO Bank N.A. v. Lala Trucking Inc, et al.
as 1:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A. and BMO Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Lala Trucking Inc and Varinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Singh et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02548
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Hina Sandhu and Jagteshpal Singh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Sonier v. Singh et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, Field Executive Review Committee, M. Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Markkis Sonier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01080
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Edwards v. Singh et al
as 2:2024cv02480
Defendant:
California Department Corrections and Rehabilitations and R. Singh
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. City of Placerville et al
as 2:2024cv02454
Defendant:
City of Placerville, Mark S. Adams and Samuel Emerson
Plaintiff:
Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. City of Elk Grove et al
as 2:2024cv02455
Defendant:
Trudau, City of Elk Grove and Bobby Davis
Plaintiff:
Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. City of Elk Grove et al
as 2:2024cv02456
Defendant:
Suzanne Kennedy, City of Elk Grove, Gerard F. Keena and others
Plaintiff:
Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. Brace
as 2:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
Danny Brace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
