Cases 1 - 7 of 7
(PS) Rider v. California State Controller's Office
as 2:2023cv02556
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rider
Defendant:
California State Controller's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
(PS) Ashford v. Yee et al
as 2:2019cv02358
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, Comerica Bank & Trust National Association, State Controller for State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Burk N. Ashford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
(PS) Selck v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2019cv01067
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services and California State Controller's Office
Plaintiff:
Morrey Selck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiang, State Controller of the State of California v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2011at00014
Plaintiff:
John Chiang, State Controller of the State of California
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilb et al v. California Correctional Peace Officers Association et al
as 2:2008at00972
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, Stationary Engineers Local 39 International Union Of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO and others
Petitioner:
David A Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilb, et al v. John Chiang, et al
as 2:2008cv01960
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner:
David A. Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
