Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Ambrose Gill v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05936
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gill
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Ten Unknown Named Defendants, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fishback et al
as 5:2010cv05084
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Johnson
Defendant:
David Fishback, M Carrizosa, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez v. City of Berkeley et al
as 4:2010cv02893
Plaintiff:
Jose Bermudez
Defendant:
City of Berkeley, R. Roe, M. B. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler et al v. Hilo Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01826
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Wheeler and Pauline Ellis
Defendant:
Hilo Medical Center, Inc., Ronald Schurra, Gary Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffiths v. Ormsby et al
as 3:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffiths
Defendant:
M. Ormsby, Linteo, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Van et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, inc. et al
as 5:2008cv05296
Plaintiff:
Nathalie Thuy Van and Nathalie Thuy Van
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, INC., John Doe and Rachel Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. City Of Oakland et al
as 4:2008cv04228
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe, Jane Roe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and Richard Valerga
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cicala et al v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2008cv04032
Plaintiff:
Paul Cicala, Enrico Sagullo and Erick Sanchez
Defendant:
City of San Jose, Robert Davis, Ordaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.