Cases 1 - 10 of 14
DOUGLAS TENNENBAUM v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tennenbaum
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, William Scott, Joseph Obidi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv05327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chiu v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2016cv04990
Plaintiff:
Newton Pak Shing Chiu
Defendant:
Robert D Sullivan , American Institute of Organbuilders , County of Alameda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnold v. City Of San Jose et al
as 5:2016cv02485
Plaintiff:
Kathy Arnold
Defendant:
City Of San Jose, Officer Huynh, Graeme Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newton v. San Quentin State Prison Organization
as 3:2015cv03217
Plaintiff:
Cardell Newton
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
County of Sonoma v. Fields of the Wood, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02506
Plaintiff:
County of Sonoma
Defendant:
Fields of the Wood, Inc. and Tony Avila Sampson
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Fields of the Wood, Inc. and Tony Avila Sampson
3rd_party_defendant:
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department: Code Enforcement Division, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Troy Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. San Quentin State Prison
as 3:2013cv03719
Plaintiff:
Cardell Newton
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
