Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Hughes et al v. Hess et al
as 4:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Deanna Hughes, Gerald Kinsel, Christine Coates and others
Defendant:
Chris A. Hess, City of San Rafael, San Rafael Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tygart et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08219
Plaintiff:
Liam Tygart, Dominic Vanhulle, Jacob Velasco and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collier v. President of Stanford et al
as 4:2022cv05375
Plaintiff:
Irina Collier
Defendant:
President of Stanford, Webmaster of Stanford, UCB Chancellor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al
as 3:2022mc80160
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Receiver:
Geoff Winkler
Defendant:
Matthew Wade Beasley, Beasley Law Group PC, Jeffrey J. Judd and others
Shoreham-Wading River Central School District v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03475
Plaintiff:
Shoreham-Wading River Central School District
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wade v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv02703
Plaintiff:
Roy Wade
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bush v. Borla et al
as 5:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Joel B Bush
Defendant:
Associate Warden E. Borla, Facility Captain M. Wade, CCII V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Atchley et al
as 3:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Atchley, T. Vang, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In the Matter of Peter Wade Timewell - SBN 115235
as 3:2021mc80289
Petitioner:
Peter Wade Timewell
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
