Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Andrew et al v. Robert Bosch LLC et al
as 3:2019cv06793
Plaintiff:
Peggy Wager, Ryan Sharif, Dan Brubaker and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03829
Plaintiff:
Danny Mata Chavez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew M Saul and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mata v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Viad Corp. and Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hugo A Mata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc. v. Mata et al
as 3:2016cv07268
Plaintiff:
Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc.
Defendant:
Jinny Lynn Mata, Gabe Joseph Mata and AAAC Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mata v. Chipotle Services, LLC
as 3:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Pascuala Mata
Defendant:
Chipotle Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Secured Capital Investment, LLC.
as 3:2015mc80255
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Receiver:
Robert P. Mosier
Defendant:
Paul Mata, David Kayatta, Mario Pincheira and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. L.A. County Government et al
as 3:2015cv02697
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner
Defendant:
L.A. County Government, Gonzales, Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Barnes
as 3:2014cv03974
Petitioner:
Erik Mata
Respondent:
Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mata et al v. Manpower Inc. / California Peninsula et al
as 5:2014cv03787
Plaintiff:
Juventina Mata, Claudia Padilla and Lesli Guido
Defendant:
Manpower Inc. / California Peninsula, Manpowergroup US Inc.,, Manpower Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
