Cases 61 - 70 of 234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martinez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2018cv07448
Plaintiff:
Domingo Guzman Martinez and Asuncion Medina De Guzman
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Vista Ford Lincoln of Oxnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Acosta v. Medina
as 3:2018cv05663
Defendant:
A. Medina
Plaintiff:
Carlos Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2018cv05670
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, C. Martella, Correction Officer Alamo and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 1:2018cv04048
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Defendant:
Carlos Bolanos, Scott Kirkpatrick, Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 4:2018cv04048
Defendant:
Medina, Scott Kirkpatrick, Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Kuerston
as 3:2018cv03816
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Kuerston, Correctional Officer C Medina and Correctional Officer M Chavez
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nathan Siedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stribling v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv03479
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Ross Haynie, Duane Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Borders
as 3:2018cv02377
Petitioner:
Jose Perez Medina
Respondent:
Dean Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
