Cases 71 - 80 of 232
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McRay v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2021cv01213
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou McRay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lin v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Does 1-50 and City of Richmond
Plaintiff:
Sarah Belle Lin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamey v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2021cv00892
Defendant:
Does 1-50, County of Sonoma and City of Santa Rosa
Plaintiff:
Ryland Stamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv09356
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Policy No. B0509B0WCN1500017, Liberty Special Markets Agency, AIU Insurance Company and others
Counter Defendant:
McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
J.B. v. City of Hayward et al
as 3:2020cv09245
Defendant:
Stephen Akacsos, City of Hayward, Samuel Tomlinson and others
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garg et al v. SF Markets, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv08439
Defendant:
DOES 1-50, SF Markets, LLC and Sprouts Farmers Markets, LLC
Plaintiff:
Subhashish Garg and Meera Garg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bracy v. Jordan et al
as 4:2020cv07585
Plaintiff:
Karl Bracy
Defendant:
Corporal Fuller, Officer Brooks, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grillo v. Monsanto Company et. al.
as 3:2020cv06501
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and JOHN DOES 1-50
Plaintiff:
Angelo Grillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 3:2020cv06343
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
PATSY ADAMS and Roy Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
