Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 3:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah and Autodesk, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Anagnost, Karen Blasing, Reid French and others
Cavalleri et al v. Hermes International, a French corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Tina Cavalleri and Mark Glinoga
Defendant:
HERMS INTERNATIONAL, a French corporation, HERMS OF PARIS, INC., a New York corporation, Hermes International, a French corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
French v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Leon French
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. French
as 3:2023cv02505
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Defendant:
A. French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verduzco v. French Art Network LLC
as 5:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Robert Verduzco
Defendant:
French Art Network LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shah v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Maulik Shah, Cesar Gonzalez, Daniel De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Gutzalenko et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gutzalenko, Honey Gutzalenko, N.G. and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Bisa French, Tom Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
French v. Wallahan et al
as 3:2021cv09446
Plaintiff:
Jade French
Defendant:
M. Wallahan, J. Mills and L. Brabec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv07312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
