Cases 1 - 10 of 2,033
Le et al v. Nguyen et al
as 5:2024cv02998
Plaintiff:
Hong Le and Victor Vothang
Defendant:
Thuan Nguyen, Anthony Nguyen, Horacio Hoang Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Anthony v. Twilio Inc.
as 3:2024cv02999
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony
Defendant:
Twilio Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Turner v. Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
as 3:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Anthony Rico Turmer
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Medina v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2024cv02921
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and SGT. Robert M Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caprera v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Anthony Caprera
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rauda
as 5:2024cv02894
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rauda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith North
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
