Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re Naturalization Ceremony 9/13/2023
as 3:2023mc80224
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Oleksandra Boiko Acosta, Neftaly de Jesus Aguilar Rodriguez and others
Jeffery
as 5:2022cv05308
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Jeffery and Donald D. Jeffery
Defendant:
A. Pelayo, M. Salas and P. Amaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz et al v. Concord Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Aguilar, Luis Cruz, Luis Ramirez Carramza and others
Defendant:
Concord Police Department, U.S. Attorney Office, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
Christine Boyd, Marissa Gazcon, Bryson Brown and others
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro III et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro III, Geraldine Montoya and Stephanie Montoya
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Richard Word, Edward Poulson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amaro v. Cury
as 3:2008cv02338
Petitioner:
Miguel Amaro
Respondent:
Ben Cury
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Innovative Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Amaro et al
as 3:2007cv05123
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Alberto Amaro and Sandra P. Amaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 3:2000cv04599
Special Master:
Christy Lopez, Kelli M. Evans, Robert S. Warshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Delphine Allen, Paul Jones, Matthew Watson and others
Petitioner:
Francisco Negrete, William Berger, Brandon Hraiz and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Richard Word, Francisco Vazquez and others
Not Classified By Court:
Edward Swanson
Intervenor:
Oakland Police Officers Association and Coalition for Police Accountabiilty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
