Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Clements et al v. Ivory
as 3:2024cv03312
Plaintiff:
George Bernard Clements, Jr., Russell Alan Robinson, Laurie Solorzano and others
Defendant:
Milous James Ivory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Clements v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 3:2023cv05642
Plaintiff:
Keva Clements
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clements v. Ivory et al
as 3:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
George Bernard Clements, Jr.
Defendant:
Milous James Ivory, Russell Alan Robinson, Laurie Solorzano and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Gamboa Jr. v. District Attorney Advasary System, Riverside County
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Clemente Manuel Gamboa Jr.
Defendant:
District Attorney Advasary System, Riverside County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc et al
as 5:2022cv07512
Petitioner:
Bradford Arthur Clements
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Wood v. Clement Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04785
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Defendant:
Clement Holdings, LLC, FCI Lender Services, Inc., SGT Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Clements v. Flo Health, Inc.
as 3:2021cv06147
Plaintiff:
Elise Michelle Clements
Defendant:
Flo Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Potter v. Clements
as 4:2021cv04811
Defendant:
Officer Clements and Officer Uyeda
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
