Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al
as 5:2011cv05496
Defendant:
Robert Venchiarutti, William Haraf, Traci Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Think Computer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv05176
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Turner
Defendant:
Melody Smith, Gregory Sims, John Bent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv04948
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Turner
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ambroselli, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Driver v. McDonald et al
as 3:2010cv02564
Petitioner:
Anthony Driver
Respondent:
Mike McDonald and Edmund Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
People of the State of California et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv05775
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Groce v. California Board of Corrections Board of Prison Terms et al
as 4:2008cv00966
Petitioner:
Pierce Landrum Groce
Respondent:
California Board of Corrections Board of Prison Terms, California Parole Commission, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCann v. Brown
as 3:2007cv04513
Petitioner:
William D. McCann
Respondent:
Edmund Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabor et al v. County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2007cv04266
Plaintiff:
John Gabor and Kay Gabor
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors, Ken Yeager, Ann Ravel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosenbalm v. Pearce et al
as 3:2007cv00776
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Tim Pearce, Edmund Brown, Jr. and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
