Cases 1 - 10 of 18
E. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03335
Plaintiff:
J. E.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quair v. San Mateo County Superior Court et al
as 3:2020cv02273
Defendant:
Anne Bouliane, J. E Karesh, San Mateo County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Golchini v. Members of the Board of Trustees of the California State University et al
as 3:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
Hassan Golchini
Defendant:
Members of the Board of Trustees of the California State University, Jerry Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephen
Defendant:
Hal Williams, K. Chappell, Totell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Peterson et al
as 5:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Anderson
Defendant:
Mark A. Peterson, David O. Livingston, Joyce C. Sasse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.E. et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv04897
Plaintiff:
J. E. and Katy Erwin
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leon v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2013cv03861
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, California Highway Patrol, Fielos Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Vicente R. Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Bachman
as 5:2007cv00622
Defendant:
J E Bachman
Plaintiff:
Willie Eugene Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
