Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Avalos v. Dr. Ashby et al
as 4:2024cv05581
Defendant:
Dr. Ashby, Government Claim Office (Sacramento, CA.), C.D.C.R. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Escamilla v. Miranda et al
as 5:2023cv05033
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Barajas Escamilla
Defendant:
Lidia Miranda, Michael's Grill & Taqueria Inc. and Jose Francisco Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
In re Naturalization Ceremony 6/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80168
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmadi, Naqibullah Ahmadzai and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Harrison v. City of Salinas et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Alvin Harrison
Defendant:
City of Salinas, Victor Cortina, Jose Luis Fletes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dada et al v. NSO Group Technologies Limited et al
as 3:2022cv07513
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dada, Sergio Arauz, Gabriela Caceres Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
NSO Group Technologies Limited and Q Cyber Technologies Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reiffer v. Luxury Presence, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07059
Plaintiff:
Paul Reiffer
Defendant:
Luxury Presence, Inc., Velasco Group, Inc., Compass California II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
