Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Singh v. Jonas et al
as 4:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh Bains, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Tiger Shroff and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan et al v. Covenant Aviation Security
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jesenia Khan, Gabriela Isabel Castillo and GIC
Defendant:
Covenant Aviation Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Khan v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06172
Plaintiff:
Farooq Khan
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Pasquale Romano and Rex S. Jackson
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amazon.Com Inc. et al v. Wasim et al
as 4:2023cv05580
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com Inc. and Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Wasim Umer, Teknobyl Digital LLC, Umer Wasim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
