Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv06332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2020cv04290
Defendant:
Tedosio LT., T. Aborn, Putnam LT. and others
Plaintiff:
Eureka Roshanda Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davillier et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Leonard Easley, Joseph Allen Hays, Bernard Kevin Miller and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06225
Plaintiff:
Octavia Mathis
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05002
Plaintiff:
Royal Mathis and Katholyn Jean Mathis
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eureka R. Mathis v. W.Z. Jenkins, II
as 4:2018cv07499
Respondent:
Unknown and W.Z. Jenkins, II
Petitioner:
Eureka R. Mathis, Eureka Roshanda Mathis, Eureka Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooke et al v. City of Berkeley et al
as 3:2018cv04420
Plaintiff:
Dylan Cooke , Lewis Williams and Brooke Anderson
Defendant:
City of Berkeley , Andrew R. Greenwood , Sean Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke et al v. City of Berkeley et al
as 4:2018cv04420
Defendant:
Samantha Speelman, Christopher Schulz, City of Berkeley and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Williams, Brooke Anderson and Dylan Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv02142
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith, Rexford Martin, Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
