Cases 1 - 10 of 91
George v. Allen
as 5:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
Keenan George
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Cisneros
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Superior Courts of California
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Jamaul Lee Baker
Respondent:
Superior Courts of California and Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv06020
Plaintiff:
Luis Pacheco
Defendant:
Trent Allen, Ayala and Orozca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv04391
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
Trent Allen, Lt. J. Parks, C. Tanori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Allen
as 3:2023cv02370
Petitioner:
Jereme J. Brown
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Trent Allen, Shagoofa Khan, Adam Carpenter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arocha v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
CDCR, Associate Warden Trent Allen and Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Christopher Vanning Johnson
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
