Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Clima v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv05330
Plaintiff:
Terrell Clima
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07409
Plaintiff:
Terrel Odom
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC, ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Jones v. Lemon et al
as 5:2022cv07202
Plaintiff:
Terrell Jones
Defendant:
T. Lemon and Howard Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Reed et al
as 5:2022cv06980
Plaintiff:
Terrell Oden
Defendant:
J. Reed and J. Peffley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2022cv06707
Plaintiff:
Christy Miles
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Wellpath Management, Inc., California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Terrell v. City of Petaluma et al
as 3:2022cv05411
Plaintiff:
Bruce Terrell
Defendant:
City of Petaluma, Ken Savano, Rick Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fontenot v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv03854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fontenot
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
792 Individual Consumers v. Intuit Inc.
as 3:2022cv02486
Plaintiff:
792 Individual Consumers, Brandie Stifel, Brandie Nielson and others
Defendant:
Intuit Inc.
Petitioner:
April Hudock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
