Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Garcia v. Start Yoshi, Inc.
as 5:2023cv06518
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Start Yoshi, Inc. doing business as Yoshi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Craven v. Garcia
as 3:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Neil Craven
Defendant:
Jose Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v County of Napa et al
as 4:2021cv03519
Plaintiff:
E. G., a Minor, Jose Garcia Flores, Juan Garcia and others
Defendant:
David Ackman and County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05086
Plaintiff:
David Jones , Dawn Harbin , Maria Garza and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mejia v. Hatton
as 5:2016cv04772
Petitioner:
Jose Garcia Mejia
Respondent:
Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Grether et al
as 3:2016cv04424
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
K. Grether, M. Aguilera and P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. County of Alameda
as 4:2014cv04035
Defendant:
County of Alameda , Alameda County Sheriff's Department , Alameda County Community Development Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Cortez , Enrique Gonzalez , Alfredo Esquivez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agulay et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2014cv00481
Plaintiff:
Philip Agulay , Clarita Agulay , Vincent Avallone and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Garcia Mejia v. Ralph M Diaz
as 5:2013cv04692
Petitioner:
Jose Garcia Mejia
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia et al v. Aurora Loans Services et al
as 5:2013cv03028
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia and Consuelo Garcia
Defendant:
Aurora Loans Services and Quality Loan Service Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
