Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Rodriguez v. Provence et al
as 3:2014cv02694
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Provence, Jenny Kirkov, Maureen Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowan v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv01886
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Maureen Hallahan , Pennie Mclaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Cowan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
O'Donnell v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv01526
Plaintiff:
Maureen O'Donnell
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rouse v. Cach, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Maureen Rouse
Defendant:
Cach, LLC and Mandarcih Law Group, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dadoush et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02815
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Dadoush , Richard Kennedy , Sara Kerby and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company, Aaipharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Dunfee et al v. Truman Capital Advisors, LP et al
as 3:2012cv01925
Plaintiff:
Gordon E. Dunfee and Maureen L. Dunfee
Defendant:
Truman Capital Advisors, LP , Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-2 , MARIX Servicing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Bank, N.A. v. Loynd et al
as 3:2012cv01712
Plaintiff:
Union Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
David S. Loynd, Maureen E. Loynd and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Backe v. Novatel Wireless, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01689
Plaintiff:
Maureen Backe
Defendant:
Novatel Wireless, Inc., George Weinert, Dan Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. ATF et al
as 3:2008cv01529
Petitioner:
James L Hines
Respondent:
ATF, DEA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Savage v. Gibilterra et al
as 3:2008cv01159
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Savage
Defendant:
Joseph Gibilterra, Maureen Gibilterra and J&M Trust DTD 12/23/03
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
