Cases 21 - 30 of 315
Beriones v. IMH Asset Corp.
as 3:2022cv01916
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Anthony Peter Vasilas, IMH Asset Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Babette T. Beriones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
(PC) Hopper v. Madden, et al.
as 3:2022cv01909
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Brian Kibler, Raymond Madden, A. Palacios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Raymond Madden and ICC Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Boucher
as 3:2022cv01658
Petitioner:
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Mark Joseph Boucher
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Staniforth v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Raymond Staniforth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 mv Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
White v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
Keith White
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Frank Sharpe, J. Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Rayvone Robinson
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, J. Gallegos, Frank Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
Kelly Beau Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackgold v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Suten Blackgold
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Mario Alonzo, D. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
