Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Medina v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Tina Medina
Defendant:
Judge Laura H. Miller, Judge Maureen H. Hallahan, Judge Jose S. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo v. Discover Bank
as 3:2023cv02206
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Castillo
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
Candelario Castillo
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Infiniti
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kleidman v. Buchanan et al
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Justice Martin N. Buchanan, Justice Jose S. Castillo and Justice Richard D. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Castillo v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Castillo
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Castillo
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act
Castillo v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Angela Marie Castillo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
