Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Swadener v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Larry Swadener
Defendant:
State of California, City of Escondido, Paul McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hernandez-Mata v. USA
as 3:2023cv01386
Petitioner:
Mauricio Hernandez-Mata
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mata v. Digital Recognition Network, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Mata
Defendant:
Digital Recognition Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mata v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00596
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dennis Mata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Rosas v. Masjedi et al
as 3:2019cv02130
Defendant:
Shannon Masjedi, Eddie Masjedi, Royalty Foods Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mata Rosas and Sergio Mata Rosas an individual doing business as Romas Produce
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Nicklas v. Kokor et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Steve Rocky Nicklas
Defendant:
W. Kokor and Ms. Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mata et al
as 3:2015mc01208
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Receiver:
Claire Schenk and Robert P. Mosier
Defendant:
Paul Mata, David Kayatta, Mario Pincheira and others
Mata Rosas v. Palominos J & R Produce, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03015
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mata Rosas
Defendant:
Palominos J & R Produce, Inc., Raul A Palomino, Irving Palomino and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
