Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vo v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Bryan Vo
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mv Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Vo v. Miller et al
as 3:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Khuong Vo
Defendant:
Amy Miller, L. Johnson, A. Variz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Guila et al
as 3:2014cv01846
Plaintiff:
Lavell Hall
Defendant:
Y. A. Guila, Edgar Clark, Teresa Mecias and others
Respondent:
Fraze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vo v. Miller
as 3:2014cv01306
Petitioner:
Khoung Q. Vo
Respondent:
Amy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phan et al v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
Truyen Gia Phan , Minh Trieu Doan , Lilyan Loc Le and others
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Barrett v. VO FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barrett
Defendant:
VO Financial Corporation and VO Financial MA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Welk Resort Group, Inc. v. VO Financial Corp. et al
as 3:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Welk Resort Group, Inc.
Defendant:
VO Financial In, Inc. , VO Financial MA, Inc. , VO Financial NJ, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beyond Dental And Health, Inc. v. Thanh Thuy Dao Vo, et al
as 3:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Beyond Dental And Health, Inc.
Defendant:
Thanh Thuy Dao Vo and Brite Impressions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
United States of America v. $30,237.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$30,237.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Long Hoang Vo
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Coach, Inc., et al v. Alluring, et al
as 3:2010cv01344
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Alluring, Vo Sy, Jacqueline Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
