Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hatten v. Barker et al
as 1:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
A. Barker, R. Andert, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McIntosh v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv02506
Plaintiff:
Richard S. McIntosh
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Joyce Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatten v. Andert et al
as 1:2010cv00601
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
R. Andert, A. Barker, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harmon v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2009cv02887
Plaintiff:
Monty Harmon
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatten v. Holland et al
as 1:2009cv02853
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
J. C. Holland, R. Andert, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. Gaouette et al
as 1:2009cv02473
Plaintiff:
William Wilson
Defendant:
David Gaouette, Kenneth Harmon, Michele Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbello et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv02199
Plaintiff:
Michael Corbello and Albert Reynolds
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Reville, Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harmon v. No Respondents Named
as 1:2009cv01499
Petitioner:
Monty Harmon
Respondent:
No Respondents Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harmon v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv01252
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harmon
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kilgore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Kilgore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Robert Pacheco, Sara M. Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
