Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dunning v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Dunning
Defendant:
Sgt. Gonzales and Officer Stack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Ellen Wang, Zize Chen, Jian Gang Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Hamman v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Al Hamman
Defendant:
University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, Alex Martins, Harold Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Defendant:
Mark Inch, D.G. Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Royer et al
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kareus Hampton
Defendant:
Travis Royer and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Officer Gonzales #213 et al
as 6:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Deltramont'e Young
Defendant:
Officer Gonzales #213 and Jones Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
David Jimenez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Steven Bingham, Robin Lynne Allweiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Gonzales
as 5:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Genesis Chappelle
Defendant:
A. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
