Cases 11 - 20 of 217
ROSE v. ATMOS NATION LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
SAI ROSE
Defendant:
ATMOS NATION LLC, CHARLY BENASSAYAG, ELI EROCH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MOORE v. DOE et al
as 3:2023cv24716
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DORN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BEN LANIER, BRENT JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. INGRAM et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D WILSON
Defendant:
INGRAM, GRANGER, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUMZY v. DOE 1-19 et al
as 3:2023cv22581
Plaintiff:
ACQUINETTA LUMZY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-19 and JANE DOE 20-21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCREYNOLDS v. LYLES et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
BLAKE AUSTIN MCREYNOLDS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER J LYLES, SERGEANT D COURTOT, NURSE JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
DUSHUN D ROBINSON
Defendant:
HILL, JANE OR JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
