Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
MARSKE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00949
Plaintiff: ROBERTA MARSKE
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOFFMAN v. JONES, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff: GERALD RAY HOFFMAN
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, CENTURION, ASBELTI LLORENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYROLL MANAGEMENT INC v. ENRESTORATION INC et al
as 3:2017cv00764
Plaintiff: PAYROLL MANAGEMENT INC
Defendant: ENRESTORATION, INC., EXCEL INSTITUTE INC, ROBERTA WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEITZ v. LEVY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff: ROBERTA D ZEITZ
Defendant: LEVY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOPEZ et al v. CITY OF ARCHER, FLORIDA et al
as 1:2014cv00155
Plaintiff: ROBERTA CAMPBELL LOPEZ and FRANCISCO ISAAC LOPEZ
Defendant: CITY OF ARCHER, FLORIDA , FRANK HAMIL OGBURN and AL GRIESHABER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. EMERALD COAST LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING INC et al
as 5:2012cv00200
Plaintiff: ROBERTA GILL
Defendant: EMERALD COAST LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING INC and JAVAD SAFDARI-SADALOO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MOFFATT v. REFUGE HOUSE INC
as 4:2011cv00546
Plaintiff: ROBERTA MOFFATT
Defendant: REFUGE HOUSE INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00266
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?