Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 429,496
SRTJR, LLC et al v. ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff: SRTJR, LLC and Optima Capital, LLC
Defendant: ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INGRAM v. T-ONE LLC
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: MARCUS INGRAM
Defendant: T-ONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Petitioner: ADAM P RUNSDORF
Respondent: PENSACOLA FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCOTT v. KEARNEY et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: VICENT L SCOTT
Defendant: RICK KEARNEY and SONYA A WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY v. GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO LLC
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN MURPHY
Defendant: GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
LAMEYER v. GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff: STACEY LAMEYER
Defendant: GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
CARTLIDGE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Scott William Cartlidge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00083
Petitioner: LARON A MINGO
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. NEWBERN et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: JEFFREY T HILL
Defendant: E NEWBERN, KIGHT, VAN HOUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?