Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SIMMONS v. KOLODZIEJ et al
as 3:2023cv20567
Plaintiff:
TAVORIS K SIMMONS
Defendant:
KOLODZIEJ, S S DOVE, SETTLEMIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EQUALITY FLORIDA et al v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
EQUALITY FLORIDA, FAMILY EQUALITY, M A and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R GRADY and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBSON v. CLEMONS et al
as 3:2021cv03947
Petitioner:
ERNEST R GIBSON, JR
Defendant:
CLEMONS, S S DOVE, FLEMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON et al v. KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
as 3:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
CARLY BLACKWELL, GRANT LOPEZ, BREANNA THOMAS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
WALTER L GIELOW, S S DOVE and RANDY TIFFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINTEROS v. S&S GRANITE AND TILE WORKS INC
as 3:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
RUPERTO QUINTEROS
Defendant:
S&S GRANITE AND TILE WORKS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. THOMAS et al.
as 3:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
S S THOMAS, WHEELER and HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEARS v. HAAS et al.
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
TERRY EUGENE SEARS
Defendant:
JENNIFER A HAAS, J F KOLODZIEJ, R LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEATON v. DIERMYER et al
as 3:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
WAYNE M BEATON
Defendant:
K W DIERMYER, S S DOVE and STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
