Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Roberson v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2024cv61631
Defendant:
Alexander Chang, Officer Ryan Cue and City of Hollywood
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Chang v. Bringer Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv21252
Plaintiff:
Alexander Chang
Defendant:
Bringer Corporation and Eduardo De Castro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Battle, Leon v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv20560
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle
Defendant:
Glenn P. Miller, James Banks, Omar Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Perry v. Chang
as 0:2023cv62361
Petitioner:
Washington Perry
Respondent:
Lisa Latoya Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Chang Dopico v. JCRB Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24136
Plaintiff:
Roberto Chang Dopico
Defendant:
JCRB Inc. doing business as Bistro Cafe, Jan Karlo Ruiz Ortiz and Tamara I. Perez Felici
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CHANG v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv24069
Plaintiff:
YU-TAI CHANG
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
