Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Haynes, Marquise v. Sergeant Dixon et al
as 1:2024cv20880
Plaintiff:
Marquise Haynes
Defendant:
Sergeant Dixon, Officer Vasquez, Officer Triplet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 0:2024cv60172
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Consular Officer JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 2:2024cv14026
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Consular Officer JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Amaya Cruz et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv20314
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Amaya Cruz, Christian Pallidine and Angel Jae Torres Bucci
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Captain J Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv24133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez v. City of West Palm Beach et al
as 9:2020cv80765
Defendant:
City of West Palm Beach, Sheriff Department of West Palm Beach FL, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso Rosales Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lago v. Monroe County et al
as 4:2019cv10126
Defendant:
Monroe Deputy GARRET TEST, Monroe Sergeant YUNIER GALVEZ, Monroe County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Alberto Lago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
