Cases 151 - 160 of 1,610
BROWN v. HOOKS, et al.
as 4:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, Officer AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN
as 7:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
TRACY CHAPMAN
Petitioner:
ROBERT BRUCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCLEOD v. MALPHUS
as 1:2022cv00132
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BECKY MALPHUS, BECKEY MALPHUS, CHANDLER GIDDES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SOLORIO v. SOLORIO et al
as 7:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
OSCAR SANTIAGO SOLORIO
Defendant:
TONYA SOLORIO and SANTIAGO SOLORIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. KELLY et al
as 5:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B MITCHELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL P KELLY and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD J AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STATE OF GEORGIA v. AL-AMEEN
as 7:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
JUSTICE QUEEN AL-AMEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
REDDICK v. US ARMY et al
as 5:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
WAYNE REDDICK
Defendant:
US ARMY, US MARINE SORP and US MARINE CORP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
DAVID Q WEBB
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TRACY JANE MULLIS, BRADFORD LEE RIGBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, SOUTHEASTERN STAGES INC, O'REILLY AUTO PARTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
