Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 90
HOGAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff: RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, EDMUND J BAZAR, JR, HUGH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. BROOKS
as 1:2019cv00044
Petitioner: CAMERON WRIGHT
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WIMBUSH v. KEMP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant: REMIKA CHRISTIAN, MARY TAYLOR, CAROLYN GILBER and others
Plaintiff: THERIAN WIMBUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. BROOKS
as 1:2019cv00020
Undetermined: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Petitioner: LOYCE HARRIS
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant: Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2019cv00006
Plaintiff: EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant: MARTY ALLEN, KEARINS, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BROOKS
as 5:2018cv00403
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Petitioner: RUDOPLH VALENTINO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. DEAL
as 1:2018cv00181
Petitioner: OTIS THOMAS
Respondent: GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TERRELL v. CALHOUN STATE PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00332
Respondent: CALHOUN STATE PRISON, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Petitioner: WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff: RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant: GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?