Cases 1 - 10 of 34
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWTON v. MOORE et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARQUIES NEWTON
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE, SGT KELLY and OFFICER CHILDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
RAMON PEREZ
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN BERRY, LIEUTENANT FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRABLE v. ROZIER et al
as 5:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
FELENTHEAN DEANDRE GRABLE
Defendant:
BRET ALAN ROZIER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONALD W KELLY and GEORGE HARTWIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
WADE OWENS, LAUREN PARISH, Judge WADE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPKINS v. KRUEGER et al
as 7:2020cv00039
Defendant:
HEATHER L KELLY, WILLIAM NEEL, ASHLEY PAULK and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE EPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXIT v. FAIRNOT et al
as 7:2019cv00194
Defendant:
OFFICER ESPINAL, OFFICER HILL, OFFICER ESPERAN and others
Plaintiff:
AKASH DIXIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILLSMAN v. QUICK, et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM HILLSMAN, RAKEMIN JAQUIN HILLSMAN, RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN and others
Defendant:
JUDGE PATRICIA BARRON, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY, MADISON COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
