Cases 151 - 160 of 26,353
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLOBAL ONE FINANCIAL v. MODI et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL ONE FINANCIAL
Defendant:
TEJAS MODI, PINALI MODI, SADHANA D PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
LATIMORE v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
AYAD S LATIMORE
Defendant:
MIKAL JONES, ASHLEY N CUELLAR, DAVID HARDGRAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HULING v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS D HULING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HATCHER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Hatcher, Carolyn J. Hatcher, BENJAMIN D HATCHER and others
Defendant:
Joseph D. Thompson, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOSEPH D THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SYMRISE INC v. SWEEGEN INC
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SYMRISE INC
Defendant:
SWEEGEN INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SLOAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SLOAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
