Cases 11 - 20 of 39
BEY v. HOWELL et al
as 7:2018cv00179
Petitioner:
TZEDKIYAH EL BEY
Respondent:
JEFF B SESSIONS, ROD HOWELL and FRANK PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE et al v. COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC et al
as 4:2018cv00145
Defendant:
COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC PENSION PLAN and COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC
Plaintiff:
YAMONA PIERCE, YVONSHA WILLIAMS and YAVETTE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TERRELL v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), HOLLOMAN, CROSS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCOLLIGAN v. VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
as 5:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
RODNEY MICHAEL MCCOLLIGAN
Defendant:
VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, JIMMY THOMAS HOWELL, JR, STEVEN J FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. EDWARDS et al
as 5:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DWAYNE EDWARDS , TODD BARKER , SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF SOCIAL CIRCLE LLC and others
Receiver:
DEREK PIERCE
PIERCE v. WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC
as 5:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
TITI PIERCE
Defendant:
WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. CLIFTON, et al
as 7:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
JASON CLIFTON and JAMIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HASTY et al
as 7:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
MELANIE HASTY and Travis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. Prine et al
as 7:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
Chris Prine and UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MT HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. KCH SERVICES INC et al
as 3:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
MT HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KCH SERVICES INC, JONATHAN T VICKERY, WESLEY WILLIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
