Cases 11 - 20 of 38
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
RUFUS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 3:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
IMARE' FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, WALTER BERRY, BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY L BARNARD, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Defendant:
VIRGIL L ADAMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
