Cases 11 - 20 of 71
SPIVEY v. FEDERAL PROBATION
as 5:2020cv00228
Respondent:
FEDERAL PROBATION
Petitioner:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPIVEY v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
as 5:2020cv00173
Petitioner:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MATA v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00150
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DOE B, GEORGIA PROBATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS ANTONIO MATA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. ELBERT COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 3:2019cv00062
Defendant:
BOWEN and ELBERT COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE
Plaintiff:
HUGH SADLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOSA NATION et al v. GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv00274
Petitioner:
LAMAR PERRYMAN and COOSA NATION
Respondent:
BUTTS COUNTY GA, JPD, GREGORY FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLY v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2018cv00237
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, MUSCOGEE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOMSEY v. DENSMORE et al
as 5:2018cv00341
Defendant:
PROBATION BUTTS COUNTY, STEVEN BRIAN THOMPSON and SHANAE DENSMORE
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MCCOMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAMAR WHITE, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. BANKSTON et al
as 4:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
JIMMY CARTER
Defendant:
BANKSTON, COLUMBUS ADULT PROBATION OFFICE and JOSEPHINE FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
