Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jenkins v. Danforth et al
as 7:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Larry Oliver Jenkins
Defendant:
William Danforth, Orr, Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Jacobs
as 5:2010cv00131
Petitioner:
Astaniel Jarvis Mann
Respondent:
Rick Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann v. Hart et al
as 7:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Astaniel Jarvis Mann
Defendant:
Warden Hart, Deputy Warden McLaughlin, Lieutenant Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gabbard v. Hart et al
as 7:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Buster Blevy Gabbard, Jr.
Defendant:
Darrell Hart, Georgia Department of Corrections and Stan Mann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Barrows et al
as 5:2008cv00238
Plaintiff:
Gaither Jerome Harris
Defendant:
Warden Barrows, Ms. Evans, Counselor Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mann et al v. Donald et al
as 7:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Astaniel Jarvis Mann, Pip Heng, Elijah Adcock and others
Defendant:
James Donald, Rick Jacobs, Sarah Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 3:2007cv00102
Plaintiff:
Valerie Booth, Valerie Booth, Valerie Booth and others
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation, Mentor Corporation and Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Greene v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tom E. Greene
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., Mann Bracken, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
