Cases 21 - 30 of 49
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE, Cleveland Lavern Spencer, RAYFIELD SPENCER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE and SANDRA G YARBROUGH JONES
Consol_defendant:
REAL ESTATE, CARLTON FARMS INC, TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
RAYFIELD SPENCER and REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
MIZE v. HODGES et al
as 3:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
STEVE MIZE
Defendant:
THOMAS L HODGES, MIKE CLEVELAND, TOMMY WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00011
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROWLAND v. COUCH et al
as 3:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
HENRY MARSHALL ROWLAND
Defendant:
GERALD COUCH, DANNY WOODS and MIKE CLEVELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLAND v. COUCH et al
as 5:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
HENRY MARSHALL ROWLAND
Defendant:
GERALD COUCH, DANNY WOODS and MIKE CLEVELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANKERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2013cv00312
Petitioner:
CLEVELAND HANKERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00078
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Royston v. Cleveland et al
as 3:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Leslie Royston
Defendant:
MIKE CLEVELAND and R. C. Oglesby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENSON v. PARKER et al
as 7:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
RANDY DENSON
Defendant:
JONI B PARKER and ELIZABETH C CLEVELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
