Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WIG STUDIO 1 LLC v. HERSHEY et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Heather Hershey an individual and sole proprietorship doing business as CysterWigs and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
Wig Studio 1, LLC and WIG STUDIO 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
STARLING v. CHASON et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
ALFRED STARLING
Defendant:
JUDGE JONATHAN K CHASON and JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPMAN v. WOODS et al
as 7:2021cv00011
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, Sgt MCCALL, SHUNDA WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW TERENCE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESLIE v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lt MCDOUGLE, HEATHER A DAVIS, Warden SHAWN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KYEVONNIE LESLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPKINS v. KRUEGER et al
as 7:2020cv00039
Defendant:
HEATHER L KELLY, WILLIAM NEEL, ASHLEY PAULK and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE EPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUTCHLEY et al v. SULLENS et al
as 4:2019cv00215
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY, JIMMY WESLEY PARKER, HEATHER CRUTCHLEY and others
Defendant:
Sergeant HOLLAND and CERT Officer SULLENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE et al
as 4:2019cv00165
Defendant:
STACY J LEE and HEATHER LEE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
