Cases 31 - 40 of 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SMITH v. MILLER et al
as 5:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W SMITH
Defendant:
CO II MILLER, LT HUDSON, OFFICER LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. MILLER COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Nicholas Price, MILLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Kreg Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RICHARD PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERAGE v. WELCH et al
as 3:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
MARY JOE BUNDY EVERAGE
Defendant:
KEVIN WELCH, ALEX HARVEY, CEO IANIOELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. ALLI et al
as 4:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
NANCY B MILLER
Defendant:
OMOTAYO B ALLI, MOFFETT FLOURNOY, CHATTAHOOCHEE CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWART v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JULIUS COWART
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Captain JASON CLIFTON, Staff Sergeant SWAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PEACH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al
as 5:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY BOBBY BEARDEN, FORT VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE VETRMYER MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SAM'S EAST INC.
as 7:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILLER
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAITHER v. DEAL et al
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
WARDEN PHILBIN, Deputy Warden PASCAL, Deputy Warden HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
