Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 76
CRAWFORD v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00184
Defendant: GDC DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP and GDC COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD
Plaintiff: ROBERT CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. KEMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00090
Plaintiff: CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II and ABDULLAH CALIPH HAMID TAYLOR
Defendant: TIMOTHY C WARD and BRIAN P KEMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. KEMP et al
as 5:2020cv00148
Plaintiff: BARRY GIBSON
Defendant: ROBERT TOOLE, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP and TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00030
Defendant: GEORGIA STATE PATROL, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GEORGIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff: NAPOLEON GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00021
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
THOMAS v. KEMP
as 1:2020cv00002
Defendant: GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP
Plaintiff: OTIS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WILLIAMS v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00372
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS
Defendant: GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, CDEPUTY WARDEN SABRINA GRANT, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KEMP et al
as 1:2019cv00072
Defendant: W DANIEL EBERSOLE, JIMMONIQUE R S ROGERS, MICHAEL BERG and others
Plaintiff: TRAVIS DONELL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDFORD v. DEAL et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Respondent: NATHAN DEAL and GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP
Petitioner: MIKE REDFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBB v. TRUMP, et al.
as 4:2019cv00066
Defendant: MICHAEL R PENCE, KAY IVY, GRETCHEN CORBIN and others
Plaintiff: HOMER DOUGLAS COBB, IV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?