Cases 41 - 50 of 488
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ARCHIBALD v. AT&T D/B/A CELLULAR WORLD et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
ABBYGALE S ARCHIBALD
Defendant:
COLUMBUS STORE AT&T D/B/A CELLULAR WORLD For Use And Benefit Of AT&T D/B/A CELLULAR WORLD, MANAGER JORDAN LNU, CASHIER KIERA LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FOSTER, et al.
as 4:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
DAVID T JOHNSON
Defendant:
URVASHI FOSTER, BILLIE JOE FOSTER, Deputy BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLINS v. MCCAULEY et al
as 3:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T ROLLINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCCAULEY and CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR HARPER
Defendant:
WILLIAM PATRICK ADAMS, REBECCA L GRIST, SHARELL FINCHER LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. HARDY, et al.
as 7:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR
Defendant:
Judge JAMES E HARDY, MARGARET CHUPARA, JEANETTE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
THOMAS v. HARDY et al
as 7:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR
Defendant:
Judge JAMES E HARDY, MARGARET CHUPARA, JEANETTE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LASTER et al v. BARNES et al
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
LINDA LASTER and JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
RUSS F BARNES, GERALD E MOORE, JOHN M DUFFOO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and CLARA VIRGINIA BRITTON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
