Cases 51 - 60 of 76
LAUGHNER v. CLIFTON et al
as 7:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J LAUGHNER
Defendant:
JAUN CLIFTON, ELKINS, B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. WOFFORD et al
as 5:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANE BREWER
Defendant:
CLINT WOFFORD, DON BLAKELEY, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Express Lane Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tueisha Grant
Defendant:
Express Lane Inc and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company v. Lane
as 7:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company
Defendant:
David Bernie Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Valdosta Police Department et al
as 7:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyrone Jackson
Defendant:
Valdosta Police Department, Alan Girsch, Travis Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Tatum
as 5:2009cv00347
Petitioner:
Dominique Lane
Respondent:
Clay Tatum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 7:2009mc00004
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc., Recruit for Wealth Inc and others
United States of America v. Funds, $165,511.87 in US et al
as 7:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds, $165,511.87 in US, Funds, $244,965.84 in US, Funds, $289,200.66 in US and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. Lane et al
as 5:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
James Lane, James E. Hardy, Justo Cabral and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
