Cases 1 - 10 of 80
VANNESS v. BAILEY
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
BRIAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASBERRY v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JIMMY MYLES, WARDEN SHARON OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GNADT et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
ETSUKO BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL GNADT and CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
DEONTRE WILLIAMS, DEANDRE LOWE, Samuel Sanders and others
Cross Defendant:
Inmate PAUL L. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. GEE et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIDEOUS LEE
Defendant:
DET GEE, SGT SILVERBERG and DET BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILL v. FIVE & TEN INC et al
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILL, MEGAN SPARKS and RACHEL BAILEY
Defendant:
FIVE & TEN, INC., HUGH ACHESON, HANK SULLY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
