Cases 1 - 10 of 32
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
YORK v. MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
MALACHI Z YORK and Dwight D York
Defendant:
MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEASLEY et al In re 2020 MERCURY NITRO Z-18
as 3:2022cv00110
In Re:
2020 MERCURY NITRO Z-18
Plaintiff:
JOHN D BEASLEY and DAWN R BEASLEY
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOLSBY v. JUDKINS et al
as 5:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD GOOLSBY
Defendant:
SGT JUDKINS, OFFICER STONE, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURTON v. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
JACK D OWENS, MD, PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC, PHOEBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KYDAISHA BURTON and KESHAWN CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOWELL v. TALTON
as 5:2019cv00361
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN TALTON, JEANIE VAUGHN, CAPTAIN GARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROOKS HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. GROSS et al
as 5:2019cv00349
Defendant:
LAWRENCE GROSS, BP EXPRESS, INC., JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30 and others
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
