Cases 1 - 10 of 28
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, WOOD FOREST NATIONAL BANK, AMBER O ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MANRIQUE YARURO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MANRIQUE YARURO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, LASALLE SOUTHEAST LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COBB v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2020cv00179
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AMBER COBB
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HASS v. USA
as 4:2020cv00128
Petitioner:
AMBER HASS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GILES v. HESTER et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN GEORGE GILES
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC, AMBER CROSS, TURNER COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGER v. FIRST CALL PREGNANCY CENTER
as 3:2019cv00030
Defendant:
FIRST CALL PREGNANCY CENTER
Plaintiff:
AMBER SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
